Had Vivo charged 2300 or 2400, it would have been a very good choice competing instead with the Mi 9 SE. Answer (1 of 7): Before reaching to a solid conclusion about which one out of Snapdragon 675 or MediaTek Helio P70 is better, let’s take a close look at the specifications in terms of architecture and clock speeds. With that being said, I totally agree that having no-notch and a better battery life is very attractive. A much better selfie camera that pops up, a notch-less display, and most likely better battery life (675 likely less battery intensive, and it has a 400MaH battery).īoth devices have their compromises, but I think that many informed consumers would pick the Mi 9. MediaTek Helio P70 is the successor of Helio P60, however it has still ARM-based 4xCortex A-73 and 4xCortex A-53 cores, yet the greatest clock speed is.
On the other hand, this new Vivo device does have some advantages. LTE is capable of downloading at faster speeds than older, 3G technology. Home > Mobiele chipset comparison > MediaTek Helio P70 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675. This phone (specification wise) should have competed in price with the SE variant of Mi 9 (1999RMB).įor just 300RMB more the Mi 9 has a telephoto lens, SD855, an arguably sleeker look, USB-C (not that I really care), fast wireless charging, and an arguably better OS. The system on a chip (SoC) has an integrated LTE cellular chip. However, Vivo has priced this in Mi 9 territory (2999RMB) and shot themselves in the foot. If this device were a few hundred RMB cheaper, it could be a competitive device.
0 kommentar(er)
